trademark

Colour trademarks in China as part of the non-traditional trademarks

A colour trademark is a trademark that consists of one or more colours, without any figurative limitation (contour). In practice this means that colours are intertwined with a brand in such a way that they become an indispensable part of the brand image.

As with all forms of trademark, the colour trademark must also be distinctive for the goods and services claimed. However, due to the large number of colours used in advertising, this is usually not the case. Trademark owners are advised to seek protection for unique colour combinations as early as possible.

An abstract...

Read more about Colour trademarks in China as part of the non-traditional trademarks

New Balance celebrates a win against Chinese copycat New Barlun

A. Background

The American sportswear company New Balance has won a major case against one of China's most famous copycat brands. New Barlun was judged by Shanghai Huangpu District Court on January 5, 2021, to pay New Balance RMB 25 million in damages for trademark infringement. This compensation is one of the largest granted to an IP holder in the sportswear sector in a Chinese court .

This decision is the latest in a longstanding legal battle between New Balance and New Barlun. New Balance's battle against the copycat brand has now lasted 16 years....

Read more about New Balance celebrates a win against Chinese copycat New Barlun

Jordan./. Qiaodan, the last match now?

Introduction

The US basketball legend Michael Jordan won an important case in Shanghai at the end of December 2020. The court judged that a Chinese sports and shoe manufacturer who has been using Jordan's name as a trademark , was acting without permission and with the intention of misleading the consumer. However, the court did not revoke the decision that the phonetic English spelling of the Chinese translation of the name Jordan can be used. The Chinese company must formally apologize, which is something unique in the Chinese legal history.

...

Read more about Jordan./. Qiaodan, the last match now?

WAR OF THE STONES; THE LEGO CASE (PART 3, The Finale)

The Shanghai Higher People's Court issued a final judgment on December 29, 2020. It denied the defendants' appeal and upheld the original decision .

In April 2019, police confiscated tools used to replicate Lego toys and toy products, as well as toy packaging, instruction manuals and delivery orders from a rented factory. The infringing products were sold under the “LEPIN” brand. According to an assessment by the Copyright Appraisal Commission of the Copyright Protection Center of China, these toys and operating instructions were essentially identical to the Lego originals and...

Read more about WAR OF THE STONES; THE LEGO CASE (PART 3, The Finale)

Under Armour ./. Uncle Martian; the final decision

In 2016, a new clothing brand Uncle Martian was announced in Jinjiang, Fujian Province , China. The company behind Uncle Martian is T ingfeilong Sporting Goods Co. (廷飞龙体育用品有限公司) . This brand’s logo and the name was found to be remarkably similar to a famous U.S. sportswear brand Under Armour . Under Armour announced that Uncle Martian’s use of Under Armour’s famous logo, name, and other intellectual property is a serious concern and blatant infringement. The U.S company then sued Tingfeilong Sporting Goods Co. and opened up a trademark infringement case...

Read more about Under Armour ./. Uncle Martian; the final decision